Manuscript rejected after revision

Answer (1 of 2): Of course, it’s possible. I once had a manuscript accepted pending suggested revisions. I didn’t know what the editor was talking about since the manuscript I forwarded to a colleague to edit and submit already included the suggested revisions. This list is not exhaustive and the editor may have rejected your manuscript for different reasons. The manuscript is sent to the wrong journal. The topic is too narrow, reports a single, unique experience, or appeals to a narrow segment of the audience. The manuscript doesn’t meet the journal's standards of focus, novelty, rigor and clarity. Query 1: If an author submits his publication in the journal and after revision, the manuscript got rejected then is there any specific post-withdrawal step/norm on the website (portal) of that ... Rejection rate and reasons for rejection after peer review: a case study of a Russian economics journal. European Science Editing 2021;47. DOI: 10.3897/ese.2021.e51999 2 of 6 Usually, the editor-in-chief or the editorial team makes the decision to reject a manuscript either immediately (desk rejection) or after one or several rounds of peer ...One key to a successful revision after an accept with major revision decision is careful execution of the specific revisions requested by the editors (which may include suggested revisions provided by the referee). ... In an extreme situation where the author repeatedly does not incorporate requested revisions, a manuscript can be rejected ...Alas, many of us fret about what to do (and not do) after being turned down by a journal. Seasoned players in the "publish or perish" game know that a rejection is by no means proof that a ...After submission of the very minor revision (changes only in 10 sentence) and proofreading, I have got this mail from the new Editor-in-Chief after 10 month that our paper got rejected based on ...On the basis of reviewer comments, the Editors may recommend acceptance, revision or rejection of a manuscript. After review of the manuscript by at least three independent experts, in addition to the views of the Editor, the decision is relayed to the authors, which may be categorized as: ... , then the manuscript is rejected and the author is ...Apr 13, 2018 · What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer’s suggestions and submitted to the journal. Only one ... May 23, 2016 · If your manuscript passes the first level of scrutiny, the journal editor will to send it to 2‒4 peer reviewers. If your manuscript is rejected 3‒6 weeks after submission, the editor most likely based this decision on the reviewers’ comments. Some of the reasons that reviewers recommend manuscript rejection include: national trust near bristol APESM rejects between 35 and 40% of submitted manuscripts without sending them to reviewers, some because their subject matter is outside of the scope of APESM. Another 30% or so are rejected after review [ 1 ]. The authors of rejected manuscripts are provided with the reasons and I think it instructive to summarise and publicise the reasons.May 03, 2022 · Alternatively, you may subscribe to the more aggressive model of “the best defense is a good offense,” and dismiss the journal reviewers as uneducated philistines who simply did not recognize the genius of your work. Facing paper rejection is harsh, but the choice thereafter is yours. You can burn the rejection notice, or frame it for ... Acceptance after minor revisions are made (acceptance) Acceptance after major revisions are made (conditional acceptance) Revision and resubmission (conditional rejection) Rejection with no chances to revise (outright rejection) If your manuscript receives conditional acceptance, then congrats—it is then time to revise some more! May 03, 2021 · Alas, many of us fret about what to do (and not do) after being turned down by a journal. Seasoned players in the “publish or perish” game know that a rejection is by no means proof that a ... Finally, manuscripts may be rejected because they have been previously published. Publishing history can play a role in current issues journals, especially if there are substantial changes made to the paper since it was first published. In this case, the editor will usually explain what differences make the paper unsuitable for the current issue.This list is not exhaustive and the editor may have rejected your manuscript for different reasons. The manuscript is sent to the wrong journal. The topic is too narrow, reports a single, unique experience, or appeals to a narrow segment of the audience. The manuscript doesn’t meet the journal's standards of focus, novelty, rigor and clarity. A paper undergoing minor revision may be rejected on the following probable grounds: 1. The minor revisions not effected as expected. 2. The author's manner of response. Unnecessary display of ...Can a manuscript be rejected after revision? Answer: Unfortunately, sometimes manuscript do get rejected after the second or even third round of revisions. This can happen due to multiple reasons such as: The authors might not have adequately addressed all the questions raised by the reviewers. May 03, 2022 · Alternatively, you may subscribe to the more aggressive model of “the best defense is a good offense,” and dismiss the journal reviewers as uneducated philistines who simply did not recognize the genius of your work. Facing paper rejection is harsh, but the choice thereafter is yours. You can burn the rejection notice, or frame it for ... In this case, the paper should probably be rejected, because two major revisions are not allowed. HOWEVER, an editor can say: "I reject this paper, but you should go through a major revision and submit a new/different paper." I got that letter on a paper about a year ago, and then used almost the same letter a few weeks ago.APESM rejects between 35 and 40% of submitted manuscripts without sending them to reviewers, some because their subject matter is outside of the scope of APESM. Another 30% or so are rejected after review [ 1 ]. The authors of rejected manuscripts are provided with the reasons and I think it instructive to summarise and publicise the reasons.Answer (1 of 2): Of course, it’s possible. I once had a manuscript accepted pending suggested revisions. I didn’t know what the editor was talking about since the manuscript I forwarded to a colleague to edit and submit already included the suggested revisions. Jul 12, 2019 · Not all manuscripts are published following revision, which potentially wastes the time of editors, reviewers, and authors. To investigate the reasons for final rejection and whether these articles were finally published, we evaluated submissions to Obstetrics & GynecologyObstetrics & Gynecology. This analysis found that manuscripts submitted to AJR that were rejected after review were published in journals with higher impact factors than those rejected without review. The commentaries provided by AJR reviewers and section editors appear to improve the quality of rejected manuscripts and thus contribute to the scientific community. May 07, 2018 · Unfortunately, sometimes manuscript do get rejected after the second or even third round of revisions. This can happen due to multiple reasons such as: The authors might not have adequately addressed all the questions raised by the reviewers. the manuscript is rejected. However, most manuscripts receiving a recommendation of Reconsider with Major Revisions from the AJR editorial staff are subsequently pub-lished in the AJR (Haines GR, personal com-munication). Furthermore, most manuscripts rejected by the AJR are ultimately published, after revision, in another journal [1]. These the hamilton collection natalia Can a manuscript be rejected after revision? Answer: Unfortunately, sometimes manuscript do get rejected after the second or even third round of revisions. This can happen due to multiple reasons such as: The authors might not have adequately addressed all the questions raised by the reviewers.Answer (1 of 2): Of course, it's possible. I once had a manuscript accepted pending suggested revisions. I didn't know what the editor was talking about since the manuscript I forwarded to a colleague to edit and submit already included the suggested revisions. I finally took a look and found tha...Finally, manuscripts may be rejected because they have been previously published. Publishing history can play a role in current issues journals, especially if there are substantial changes made to the paper since it was first published. In this case, the editor will usually explain what differences make the paper unsuitable for the current issue.Of those, 336 were immediately rejected and 434 went on to peer review. During this period, the overall rejection rate was 62.6% and the rejection rate after peer review was 35.7%. The 6 most common reasons for rejection after peer review were: flaws in methodology and study design, poor reporting of methodology, poor statistical analysis ... What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer's suggestions and submitted to the journal.Proofreading is often the last step in the manuscript preparation process and is completed after the final revision. In addition to the consistency issues mentioned above, manuscript proofreading catches errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and formatting. ... In the case of manuscript rejection or conditional acceptance, manuscripts must ...munication). Furthermore, most manuscripts rejected by the AJR are ultimately published, after revision, in another journal [1]. These facts should be encouraging to AJR authors and an impetus to quickly revise a manuscript after responding to reviewers' comments. However, for many authors, the process of revising a manuscript is an ...Many instructional guides have been published on how to write scientific papers. Likewise, many published articles have focused on the reasons why submitted manuscripts are rejected. However, fewer publications have been presented to guide authors on how to address reviewers' comments in a manuscript revision. Even fewer counsel authors on how to deal with a rejection decision. In this article ... acer aspire one d257 13685 Send a message to the editor handling your manuscript using the manuscript management system, see I would like to send a message to the editor about my paper (already submitted). This can be done when you submit a revision, or at any other time Revised/Rejected Paper Editing. Our Publication Support offers a tailored editing service to help you with research paper revision, manuscript re-submission, or responding to reviewer comments. The Revised/Rejected Paper Editing service is ideal if you want to meet any of the below objectives: Resubmit to the same target journal.reasons that a manuscript may be rejected for publication. Manuscripts that report research that has used human participants may be rejected if the consenting process for participants was inadequate. Indeed, since the beginning of 2017, all manuscripts published in APESM are required to have an ethical statement printed immediately prior to theThis analysis found that manuscripts submitted to AJR that were rejected after review were published in journals with higher impact factors than those rejected without review. The commentaries provided by AJR reviewers and section editors appear to improve the quality of rejected manuscripts and thus contribute to the scientific community. The journal's editor sent your manuscript to two or more reviewers, and at least one of them felt that substantial changes were needed. However, some added work and/or explanation can resolve these issues. That's interpreted as major revisions. That's why you're still in the game. You can make it better.Apr 13, 2018 · What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer’s suggestions and submitted to the journal. Only one ... Jul 12, 2019 · Not all manuscripts are published following revision, which potentially wastes the time of editors, reviewers, and authors. To investigate the reasons for final rejection and whether these articles were finally published, we evaluated submissions to Obstetrics & GynecologyObstetrics & Gynecology. Nov 11, 2020 · No technical modifications were requested for the majority (n = 664/898, 73.9%) of rejected manuscripts; of the others which underwent technical modification (n = 234/898, 26.1%), 33/234 (14.1%) were rejected without peer review, while the remaining (n = 201/234, 85.9%) were rejected after peer review or editorial re-review. It is equally unethical and sad that, some editors do not communicate the outcome of manuscripts 2,3,4,5, even 10 months after it has been reviewed and rejected. Cite 2 Recommendations acis mental health adelaide The journal's editor sent your manuscript to two or more reviewers, and at least one of them felt that substantial changes were needed. However, some added work and/or explanation can resolve these issues. That's interpreted as major revisions. That's why you're still in the game. You can make it better.The sting of rejection was just as sharp the fourth time around for Marcus Bischoff, a postdoc at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the University of Cambridge, U.K."There's a lot of disappointment," he says, when your manuscript gets rejected by a journal. After a year of trying, he was both relieved and pleased when the fifth journal--a "good journal," he says--accepted his paper.The sting of rejection was just as sharp the fourth time around for Marcus Bischoff, a postdoc at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the University of Cambridge, U.K."There's a lot of disappointment," he says, when your manuscript gets rejected by a journal. After a year of trying, he was both relieved and pleased when the fifth journal--a "good journal," he says--accepted his paper.Table I-Publication Success Rates for Previously Rejected Manuscripts* Rejected Rejected Manuscripts Subsequentlv Manuscripts, Published in Other [oumuls, Study] Therapeutic Area No. No.(%) Publication Delay HaIl and Wilcox, 2007:' Epidemiology 155 116 (75) Most published within 19 mo Mundy, 19841 " General medicine 113 82 (73) Most published ... This analysis found that manuscripts submitted to AJR that were rejected after review were published in journals with higher impact factors than those rejected without review. The commentaries provided by AJR reviewers and section editors appear to improve the quality of rejected manuscripts and thus contribute to the scientific community. Technical reasons for rejection include: Incomplete data. For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls. Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether. Inappropriate methodology for answering your hypothesis or using old methodology that has been surpassed by newer, more ... Oct 20, 2018 · This type of rejection is often done by the editor within 24 hours to a week after submission. Immediate rejection is frustrating, and you may be disappointed or angry, but it is no reason to despair. You just need to choose another journal, change the layout of the manuscript to match the new journal´s format, and submit it again. Oct 16, 2001 · Managing the space requirements of the journal is a joint responsibility of the editor and the publisher, and both should be on top of page counts well enough in advance to anticipate whether there is space to accept a given paper. In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. May 03, 2021 · Alas, many of us fret about what to do (and not do) after being turned down by a journal. Seasoned players in the “publish or perish” game know that a rejection is by no means proof that a ... Oct 16, 2001 · Managing the space requirements of the journal is a joint responsibility of the editor and the publisher, and both should be on top of page counts well enough in advance to anticipate whether there is space to accept a given paper. In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. It is equally unethical and sad that, some editors do not communicate the outcome of manuscripts 2,3,4,5, even 10 months after it has been reviewed and rejected. Cite 2 Recommendations sardinia italykroger cake catalogThe above two cases will often result in desk rejection of the manuscript rather than peer review. It might, however, still be likely that the manuscript can be published in a different venue. ... pages. So, in general, editors will ask for a revision if they think that it is likely that the paper will be accepted after the revision, and will ...What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer's suggestions and submitted to the journal.Jul 16, 2018 · DOI: 10.1111/head.13343 Corpus ID: 51630022; Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache @article{Hesterman2018ReasonsFM, title={Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache}, author={Chelsea Hesterman and Christina L. Szperka and Dana P. Turner}, journal={Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain}, year={2018}, volume={58} } Alas, many of us fret about what to do (and not do) after being turned down by a journal. Seasoned players in the "publish or perish" game know that a rejection is by no means proof that a ...This list is not exhaustive and the editor may have rejected your manuscript for different reasons. The manuscript is sent to the wrong journal. The topic is too narrow, reports a single, unique experience, or appeals to a narrow segment of the audience. The manuscript doesn't meet the journal's standards of focus, novelty, rigor and clarity.Apr 13, 2018 · What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer’s suggestions and submitted to the journal. Only one ... Rejection rate and reasons for rejection after peer review: a case study of a Russian economics journal. European Science Editing 2021;47. DOI: 10.3897/ese.2021.e51999 2 of 6 Usually, the editor-in-chief or the editorial team makes the decision to reject a manuscript either immediately (desk rejection) or after one or several rounds of peer ...However, fewer publications have been presented to guide authors on how to address reviewers' comments in a manuscript revision. Even fewer counsel authors on how to deal with a rejection decision. In this article, the authors present a literature review on the strategies to get a manuscript accepted, despite an initial unfavorable review. Answer (1 of 2): Of course, it’s possible. I once had a manuscript accepted pending suggested revisions. I didn’t know what the editor was talking about since the manuscript I forwarded to a colleague to edit and submit already included the suggested revisions. Nov 11, 2020 · No technical modifications were requested for the majority (n = 664/898, 73.9%) of rejected manuscripts; of the others which underwent technical modification (n = 234/898, 26.1%), 33/234 (14.1%) were rejected without peer review, while the remaining (n = 201/234, 85.9%) were rejected after peer review or editorial re-review. best olympic swimming pools in the world Oct 16, 2001 · Managing the space requirements of the journal is a joint responsibility of the editor and the publisher, and both should be on top of page counts well enough in advance to anticipate whether there is space to accept a given paper. In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. Oct 16, 2001 · Managing the space requirements of the journal is a joint responsibility of the editor and the publisher, and both should be on top of page counts well enough in advance to anticipate whether there is space to accept a given paper. In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. Technical reasons for rejection include: Incomplete data. For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls. Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether. Inappropriate methodology for answering your hypothesis or using old methodology that has been surpassed by newer, more ... Of the multiple reasons summarized in Table 12.1, improper study design is one of the most common causes for rejection of the manuscript [2, 3]. Since rejection is inevitable even for senior researchers, one should be aware of available options after rejection . Every author has some choices after a manuscript is rejected by a journal.Apr 13, 2018 · What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer’s suggestions and submitted to the journal. Only one ... See full list on biosciencewriters.com Oct 16, 2001 · Managing the space requirements of the journal is a joint responsibility of the editor and the publisher, and both should be on top of page counts well enough in advance to anticipate whether there is space to accept a given paper. In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. This list is not exhaustive and the editor may have rejected your manuscript for different reasons. The manuscript is sent to the wrong journal. The topic is too narrow, reports a single, unique experience, or appeals to a narrow segment of the audience. The manuscript doesn’t meet the journal's standards of focus, novelty, rigor and clarity. nsx troubleshooting commands munication). Furthermore, most manuscripts rejected by the AJR are ultimately published, after revision, in another journal [1]. These facts should be encouraging to AJR authors and an impetus to quickly revise a manuscript after responding to reviewers' comments. However, for many authors, the process of revising a manuscript is an ...The above two cases will often result in desk rejection of the manuscript rather than peer review. It might, however, still be likely that the manuscript can be published in a different venue. ... pages. So, in general, editors will ask for a revision if they think that it is likely that the paper will be accepted after the revision, and will ...Data were extracted from the AJR's manuscript submission system. Standard statistical analysis was used to assess the fate of a sample of 200 rejected manuscripts. Results: Of the 200 manuscripts studied, 117 (59%) were published in other scientific journals (61 with revision, 56 without revision; Χ 2 = 0.329, p = 0.566). Thirty-two of the 61 ...However, fewer publications have been presented to guide authors on how to address reviewers' comments in a manuscript revision. Even fewer counsel authors on how to deal with a rejection decision. In this article, the authors present a literature review on the strategies to get a manuscript accepted, despite an initial unfavorable review.Jul 22, 2022 · It sounds to me like 1) your original manuscript was rejected, 2) you tried to resubmit anyways, and 3) the journal rejected your resubmission without further consideration. The result (3) sounds completely normal to me given (1) + (2); the place where something went wrong is when you tried to resubmit a rejected manuscript. Can a paper get rejected after minor revision? Sometimes a revised manuscript goes out to a new reviewer, so although the minor revisions may have been done in a thorough manner, the new may identify other issues with the manuscript, which might result in a recommendation to reject. ... Major revision indicates the manuscript definitely needs ...Nov 11, 2020 · No technical modifications were requested for the majority (n = 664/898, 73.9%) of rejected manuscripts; of the others which underwent technical modification (n = 234/898, 26.1%), 33/234 (14.1%) were rejected without peer review, while the remaining (n = 201/234, 85.9%) were rejected after peer review or editorial re-review. 5. It's not the right genre. Maybe the literary journal just filled their last poetry slot for this issue, and they're only looking for prose. Maybe romance just sells better than your magical ...This analysis found that manuscripts submitted to AJR that were rejected after review were published in journals with higher impact factors than those rejected without review. The commentaries provided by AJR reviewers and section editors appear to improve the quality of rejected manuscripts and thus contribute to the scientific community. Manuscript received August 18, 2008; revision accepted Septem-ber 4,2008. ... Flow diagram illustrating the choices authors can make after receiving a manuscript rejection letter from the editor oftheir first-choice journal. Table 2-Common Wording Used in Outright or Conditional Rejection LettersJul 22, 2022 · It sounds to me like 1) your original manuscript was rejected, 2) you tried to resubmit anyways, and 3) the journal rejected your resubmission without further consideration. The result (3) sounds completely normal to me given (1) + (2); the place where something went wrong is when you tried to resubmit a rejected manuscript. Jul 29, 2021 · Manuscript rejection comes as a setback for aspirants research scholars and marks as a hurdle to accomplish higher education or promotion in their respective fields. This is a more heart-wrenching situation in the case of young researchers who have attached high expectations from their work or heading towards the “1 st published work” of ... Finally, manuscripts may be rejected because they have been previously published. Publishing history can play a role in current issues journals, especially if there are substantial changes made to the paper since it was first published. In this case, the editor will usually explain what differences make the paper unsuitable for the current issue. Answer (1 of 2): Of course, it’s possible. I once had a manuscript accepted pending suggested revisions. I didn’t know what the editor was talking about since the manuscript I forwarded to a colleague to edit and submit already included the suggested revisions. Technical reasons for rejection include: Incomplete data. For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls. Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether. Inappropriate methodology for answering your hypothesis or using old methodology that has been surpassed by newer, more ... p320 thumb restthe manuscript is rejected. However, most manuscripts receiving a recommendation of Reconsider with Major Revisions from the AJR editorial staff are subsequently pub-lished in the AJR (Haines GR, personal com-munication). Furthermore, most manuscripts rejected by the AJR are ultimately published, after revision, in another journal [1]. TheseJul 12, 2019 · Not all manuscripts are published following revision, which potentially wastes the time of editors, reviewers, and authors. To investigate the reasons for final rejection and whether these articles were finally published, we evaluated submissions to Obstetrics & GynecologyObstetrics & Gynecology. Answer (1 of 2): Of course, it’s possible. I once had a manuscript accepted pending suggested revisions. I didn’t know what the editor was talking about since the manuscript I forwarded to a colleague to edit and submit already included the suggested revisions. Aug 11, 2021 · After a manuscript is submitted to a target journal, it undergoes peer review. However, several steps occur that often only the corresponding author is aware of. Once submitted to a journal, the manuscript travels around quite a bit and the manuscript status is followed using the manuscript number. The manuscript is either accepted or rejected. Proofreading is often the last step in the manuscript preparation process and is completed after the final revision. In addition to the consistency issues mentioned above, manuscript proofreading catches errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and formatting. ... In the case of manuscript rejection or conditional acceptance, manuscripts must ... malvern animal shelterApr 13, 2018 · What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer’s suggestions and submitted to the journal. Only one ... 1. It fails the technical screening. Before they even go to the editor-in-chief, articles are checked for technical elements. The main reasons they are rejected are: Peter Thrower, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the international journal of the American Carbon Society, and Professor Emeritus of Material Sciences and Engineering at Penn ...Hello everyone. In April 2018, I submitted my paper to a Q2 journal. In less than a week, the manuscript status was "Under review." Since then, I was waiting to find out what would happen next. I waited for really long until I decided to politely remind the editor in January 2019. The very next day, I received major revisions from 4 reviewers. I tried to address the reviewers'concerns to the ...Apr 13, 2018 · What is the rough probability of rejection of a manuscript after two rounds of major revisions? After the first review, I revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments. The reviewer raised a new issue in the second round of review and recommended that I revise the manuscript again. I revised the manuscript as per the reviewer’s suggestions and submitted to the journal. Only one ... This analysis found that manuscripts submitted to AJR that were rejected after review were published in journals with higher impact factors than those rejected without review. The commentaries provided by AJR reviewers and section editors appear to improve the quality of rejected manuscripts and thus contribute to the scientific community. 1. Take a step back. After receiving a rejection letter from a journal, you should give yourself a few days to process it before making any sort of decision about the article’s future. After reading the letter once, it can be helpful to put it aside for a day or two before reading it again more carefully. This will help clear your head and ... This analysis found that manuscripts submitted to AJR that were rejected after review were published in journals with higher impact factors than those rejected without review. The commentaries provided by AJR reviewers and section editors appear to improve the quality of rejected manuscripts and thus contribute to the scientific community. Of papers that were sent out for review, the acceptance rate is 51% for papers from English-speaking countries and 42% for papers from China. If we consider the fate of all the submissions, including the papers that were rejected without review, papers from English-speaking countries have about a 25% acceptance rate and papers from China have a ... fort pierce non emergency number xa